Britain’s NATO obligations under scrutiny amid underfunding concerns

Public reports have revealed that General Patrick Sanders of the British Army has expressed serious concerns about the UK’s military capabilities in NATO and other global commitments. 

Britain was left without 155mm serviceable self-propelled artillery
Photo by Pfc. Rhonda J. Roth-Cameron

The Telegraph, a respected British publication, recently featured a letter penned by the well-known British Army General, Patrick Sanders. Addressed to various former military chiefs of the UK, the letter candidly discusses the challenges currently facing the UK’s defense forces

In particular, General Sanders’ letter highlights his concerns about what he describes as “the inadequate financial support of the British army, and the significant mismatch between monetary allocation and the ambitions professed by London”. He openly voiced concerns that, when faced with critical decisions, the British military might fall short of fulfilling its responsibilities towards NATO and conducting operations abroad. 

UK will train Ukrainian pilots, even though it cannot train its own - eurofighter typhoon
Photo credit: Pixabay

General Sanders cautioned, “The risk to our strategic stability is real, with a potential outcome of being reduced to smaller, stationary, nationally focused land forces.” He continued, “I question whether this is the kind of army that our country needs or the one that our politicians envision.” In his letter, he also admitted his struggles with conveying these concerns to the Defense Secretary.

Over 2% of GDP

British analysts emphasize that, since 2010, the UK military has been significantly engaged in the military commitments of the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq. Consequently, their defense expenditures have consistently exceeded the 2% GDP threshold set by NATO. Interestingly, these allotments didn’t seem to be adequate, leading to the postponement or cancellation of specific weapon procurement programs to stave off additional costs. 

A prime example of this is the difficulties faced with the deployment of the ‘Ajax‘ armored personnel carrier. The Scout SV program commenced in 2014 to replace the CVR[T] armored carriers of the UK army. This program was initiated by the British affiliate of the US-based group General Dynamics Land Systems [GDLS UK], backed by a substantial budget of around 4.5 billion euros. 

The objective was to accelerate this program, with the initial supply of the Ajax armored combat vehicles scheduled for 2017. But, regrettably, the project remains unfinished. The focus now is to ensure the first batch of these armored vehicles is delivered no later than the end of 2025 – a staggering eight years behind the initial timetable.

Reduced army personnel

As mentioned in General Sanders’ communications, the most recent assessment of the UK’s defense and security environment in 2021 by the British government – revised to consider the situation in Ukraine – has resulted in a reduction of the British Army’s size from approximately 82,000 to around 73,000 troops. This decline, according to Sanders’ analysis, should ideally be compensated for with advancements in fields like robotics. 

Britain wants to modernize the Ukrainian navy with new missile boats
Photo credit: Defence 24

However, taking into account the numerous recruitment and retention issues that the British Army is facing, the future could see the UK’s Armed Forces shrink to fewer than 70,000 soldiers by the year 2026. 

Similarly, the article highlights, “The British Army, in its current state, still can mobilize 16,000 troops for participation in NATO’s Steadfast Defender operations and take the lead in a multinational battalion in Estonia. But the pertinent question is, for how long can these resources be sustained?”


Follow us everywhere and at any time. has responsive design and you can open the page from any computer, mobile devices or web browsers. For more up-to-date news, follow our Google News, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook pages. Our standards: Manifesto & ethical principles